Queers: Let's Resist the Racist Blame Game Post Prop 8, by Adele

by Adele Carpenter

Dear Friends,

I am writing because I am disturbed by the string of articles, blog entries, and list serve threads that have come out in the last few days suggesting that the high turnout of African American and Latino voters for the presidential election was responsible for the passage of California’s proposition 8, which dealt a heavy blow to LGBT families by banning gay marriage.

These articles mistakenly imply that the struggles for civil rights for LGBT people and communities of color are separate or even at odds with each other. They deny the work that LGBT people of color do to combat homophobia and transphobia in their families and communities, often while facing racism within the queer community as well. These articles deny homophobia among white people, and they displace blame away from those who actually have the power to consistently deny others civil and human rights, and instead, charge that when communities that have long been disenfranchised and alienated from political processes begin to participate, that the results with be negative for LGBT people.

I believe all communities need to be held accountable for their homophobia and transphobia. I want to acknowledge the suffering and hardship that the passage of Proposition 8 has caused for LGBT couples and families. But, while the media casts blame on communities of color for the failure of civil rights for LGBT people, it is imperative that we struggle against the logic that tells us that struggles for LGBT civil rights and racial justice are separate, and that we examine our strategies for advancing LGBT civil rights and gay marriage and, in particular, look at places where LGBT communities have failed to align our struggles for civil rights with ongoing struggles for racial justice.

In the months leading up the election, I saw a massive mobilization within the queer spaces in which I spend time in San Francisco to get people to vote no on 8. We live in a state that has one of the highest incarceration rates in a nation with the highest incarceration rate in the world. Studies have estimated that at any time, 40 percent of black men in their 20’s in California are under control of the correctional system. Criminalization affects many LGBT people, in particular, those that may be experiencing addiction or who, lacking familial support, move to expensive cities where they may have a hard time accessing affordable housing and living-wage work. Despite this, I saw little or no public discourse among LGBT people about very important state propositions: 5, 6, and 9, all of which potentially impacted things like funding for prisons, alterations to sentencing for drug crimes, or the trying of minors as adults in this state.

In the last months, we have seen raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) throughout the state and in San Francisco. Many people immigrate here as a result of the US foreign policy of destabilizing foreign economies. Additionally, San Francisco is home to many LGBT immigrants who have come to the country seeking safety and asylum. While my inbox was flooded with emails pertaining to Prop 8, I heard from very few queer people who were seeking to mobilize around the October 31st demonstration to protest ICE raids, or other work pertaining to ICE raids, and San Francisco’s establishment as a sanctuary city.

The November ballot contained several important city initiatives that could have affected the livability of our city both for low-income people of color and for many queer people. Proposition K, an initiative to decriminalize prostitution would have helped sex workers in this city to make major strides in their ability to organize for their rights and safety, allowing them to better protect themselves against violence and police harassment. Despite the fact that many, many young LGBT people in this city earn their livings as sex workers and daily face risks to their safety, and that two trans women working as sex workers lost their lives while working in San Francisco in 2007, I saw shockingly little effort among LGBT people to educate themselves on the realities facing sex workers or the background on Proposition K, let alone to spread any word about it.

Similarly, proposition B, which would have mandated that the city set aside part of its budget for affordable housing was defeated by SF voters. In a city with a history of racist schemes of redevelopment and displacement (SOMA in the 60’s, Justin Herman’s redevelopment of the Fillmore, illegal evictions in the Mission in the 90s, contemporary cuts to county welfare, and most recently, the gentrification of Bayview—to name a few), San Francisco voters have failed to stand up for working families’ ability to live affordably in this city—a city with where remaining working class communities of color face major threats of displacement. Despite the fact that white LGBT people often play complicated roles in the gentrification of the city and displacement of communities of color, I saw no media reports released on November 5th scrutinizing the voting trends of white LGBT San Franciscans on Propositions B, N, K, 5, 6, or 9, as juxtaposed to the numerous articles scrutinizing the voting habits of Black and Latino voters on Prop 8. And despite the overwhelmingly negative outcome of several important local and state propositions, outcry among the wider LGBT community seems to have been reserved only for Prop 8.

As a young, queer, person living in San Francisco, I feel very strongly that affordably in this city is vital to the creativity and well being of the LGBT community of San Francisco. As a white person living in the Mission, I have to think and act critically in regards to the complicated role I play in the gentrification of this neighborhood and the larger schemes of displacement within this city. I love my queer life and love living in this city. I get to witness the ways of living and congregating, making new families, new cultures, and envisioning new worlds that are possible living in a city with so many other brilliant and creative queer people. While I would like to lend my support and compassion to the people who lost the right to marry this week, I also question the logic that tells me that my only struggle as an LGBT person centers around my right to marry, rather than my ability to live and create in many other ways within a city I love. Affordable housing is central to the vitality of the LGBT community in San Francisco, to all communities, and while I sign petitions to support marriage as a right, I would like to see LGBT Californians take a serious look at the fact that housing, healthcare, and freedom from incarceration are also civil and human rights.

I would like to see LGBT Californians talk not only about their right to receive their partners’ health benefits but about universal healthcare. I would like to hear us talk not just about how many LGBT people’s partners cannot receive citizenship rights because of a lack of marriage rights, but connect this to struggles for immigrant rights in this state. I would like to hear LGBT people not only talk about how their families are discriminated against, but think about how many families in California are living in alternative family structures because of the mass incarceration of parents with children.

The passing of Proposition 8 is a sad day and indicative of the work that lies ahead, however, as we heal from these blows, I would like to challenge us to consider how our struggles are bound up with struggles for racial and economic justice, and how our fight for civil rights, and the health of our communities could be strengthened by taking these connections more seriously. Above all, I would like to challenge us to resist racist media schemes that, during our moment of need and a moment of possibility, are attempting to pit LGBT people and supporters against communities of color in California.

I apologize for the hasty construction of this, but time is of the essence. I welcome your thoughts.

In struggle,
Adele Carpenter
yesyesready@gmail.com

I realized I forgot a few things I was going to say, and am so not blog-savvy that I could not immediately figure out how to edit.

Firstly, one reason I named it Post Eight is because this is not just about Proposition 8, but about 2008 itself. There is an emerging meme that our work is now beginning now that we are in the post-election. And I keep thinking about many things about this election, and this entire year: the first African-American president, the economic meltdown, airbrushed children singing from the Beijing Olympics, Sarah Palin mocking herself alongside Tina Fey on Saturday Night Live. I believe we are in an unprecedented historical moment, but it's so easy to let moments get away with us without reflection or direction. In a time when reading this morning's Sunday Week in Review felt like old news because the election was already 5 days ago, I remind myself to think deeply and sincerely about the complex layers of historical Not only is my work, then, about fundamental LGBT rights and committments, but about uncovering the historical amnesia that tends to obscure the complex layers of information that work us over as media consumers. It is my hope that this work that i identify as "mine" is shared by many, and that there are many applications to this work. It is also my hope that I stop calling it work, stop seeing it as another thing to do or another email to write about, but rather, something that communities engage in and work together on to expand into passionate and authentic discourse.

Alternately, this blog could be just another space for us to group-chat and run inside jokes and sexual innuendos into the ground while having political discussion. That's incredibly enjoyable as well. I am a firm beleiver that truth and beauty is uncovered in unexpected moments of an overkilled and perhaps apolitical joke, but then again, I am dialectical and postmodern in general. I am hoping that this space will attract others that operate like this, others that don't operate like this at all, or anything in between. I just basically want to talk about it -- all of it.

xoxoxoxo ivy

The hoped purpose of this blog:Change is the new Hope

I thought of starting a blog the other day when I was brainstorming signs to carry in the November 7 rally and march. I considered a lot of things along the lines as"Prop 8 is a sleeping dragon you weren't expecting", "Mormons just radicalized a bunch of queers" "'We will change this' is the new 'I hope this doesn't pass'" or "52% of you make me ashamed to be a Californian." I ended up just stealing Joe Hill's line and wrote "Don't Mourn, Organize!" Even though that is a paraphrase of Joe Hill, I beleive the sentiment reflects how I feel. A lot of people were caught off guard and disappointed by this, but I firmly beleive that not only is our fight not over but this is an opportunity to get smart and sincere about expanding this fight and dialouge -- to fight not only for marriage, but things like health care access,and employment discrimination, to name a few.

Anyway, what I see for this is that folks consider this a conversation among friends where we can figure out where we are going to go from here, who is in and out of this conversation, what roadblocks are in the way of taking various paths, what moves us forward and what moves us backwards/to the side, and what kinds of conversations we may be missing while we're busy having the ones that we want to have. I thought maybe we could have this as a rotating political salon for people who like online discussion, or a way to get in touch and make plans to get with other people who have similar thoughts and goals. I don't really know, I just know that if I am silent and in my own head any longer, I may die a big, gay, glittery death.

I'll post some more signs I saw in the march, and maybe some discussion questions. I have a lot of thoughts that I want to post, but I wanted to put this space up first, and hopefully, other people have thoughts to share.

xoxoxoxo
ivy